The results of the KCJ contest held during the Obon holidays in August have been announced.
Of these, the three that seem to show the relative reproducibility of “tactile reception” (compared to auditory reception) are:
“IM: Miscopy of the callsign of other party”,
“RR: Miscopy of the RST sent by other party”, and
“MR: Miscopy of the multi-signature sent by other party”.
Of these, everyone had zero RRs, because the RST report in a contest is almost always “599”. So “RR” can be denied.
So, if you compare the first “IM” and the fifth “MR” of the 12 numbers following the SCORE in this table with the entrants ranked nearby, you can see that although my number (JK1FNN) is “IM=3 and MR=2″, it is not particularly high. (The total number of stations I contacted is 78 in the “QSOs” column.) From the above, we can say that this “tactile telegraph by vibration” maintains the same level of intelligibility as “auditory telegraph” even in a “CW contest” .